Does Jesus Endorse Blind Faith?


I commonly get a push back on the idea
of defending your faith with evidences as opposed to having blind faith because
of something Jesus said to Thomas at the end of the Gospel of John. Remember
Thomas, the doubter, he said, “I’m not going to believe that you actually saw Jesus
unless I could put my fingers in the palm of his hand or into the wound in
His side.” And then of course, Jesus appears to all of them, this time when
Thomas is there, and He invites Thomas to go ahead and to touch His wounds. And
then Jesus says, “…because you have seen, you believe? Blessed are those who
haven’t seen and yet believe.” Now the way this is understood by many people is as
Jesus’ affirmation of blind faith. “You haven’t seen, but believe.” Blind people
don’t see, so this is blind faith that Jesus is commending. Now, this can’t
possibly be what Jesus means, and the reason is is because of what John writes
in the very next verse. He says, “Many other signs and wonders Jesus also
performed that were not written in this book; but these,” he says, “have been
included…” Why did John include the evidence of miracles in the Gospel of
John? “…so that you would believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and
in believing have life in His name.” “In other words, the whole reason that John
wrote the Gospel of John, according to John, is so that he could give evidence
that Jesus was the Christ, and the evidence would encourage you to believe
in Him and be rescued. Okay, now why is this significant? Because John can’t be
recording a statement that Jesus is making that essentially
promotes blind faith as a virtue when the very next verse he tells the reason
for writing his gospel is to encourage thoughtful evidence-based faith, alright?
It would be a direct contradiction. That is not what Jesus had in mind. Remember
Jesus’ words, “…because you have seen, you believe… Blessed are those who have not
seen…” That is, seen with the eyes. Most people since the time Jesus rose from
the dead who believed in Jesus didn’t see him. They trusted the testimony of
those who did, which is exactly what Thomas should have
done. He had seen Jesus work miracles, even raised the dead. So when they said
they saw Him, he should have believed him. Instead, he said, “I’m not going to believe
until I stick my finger in the wound,” and basically, Jesus was saying, “That’s a
little bit much, but if that’s what you require, here you go.” Jesus is not arguing
against a thoughtful evidenced faith. He is chastising Thomas for requiring an
extreme level of evidence, that’s all. You and I haven’t seen. What do we have? We
have the evidence of the eyewitnesses. One of them being John writing the
Gospel of John so that we’d have the evidences to put our confidence in
Christ and be rescued by Him.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *